Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Larry Hicock's avatar

Great reads says this diehard Byrds fan who agrees with much of your scathing honesty. 👏👏👏👏

Expand full comment
MrMojoRisin's avatar

I never seriously understood either yours or Nathan's arguments against Younger Than Yesterday. The grounds by which both of you attack the album seem perfectly applicable to the Byrds in general: if you find "Thoughts and Words" disjointed (how can you make this argument when you give Fifth Dimension an A, having songs even more disjointed) or songs like "Time Between" or "The Girl With No Name" to be filler, I could say that about a very sizable chunk of their discography, most notable Turn Turn Turn and Notorious. If you find "My Back Pages" to be recitations, then I do not see seriously see such a big gap between this and the others Byrds covers of Dylan songs: the instrumentation is as pretty as usual and it was a theme that fit with the Byrds catalog (like "Goin' Back").

The truth is (or at least how I see it) is that the band always had a bit of a songwriting problem in shaping their sound into songs that do not collapse into (beautiful) mush, and their praised Dylan covers honestly were fairly humorless, passively internalized, and had a very stiff interpretation of his style not unlike the other stiff folkies of the revival. On those grounds, I think it is *very* hard to make an argument that this is weaker than the other albums, and it also to me makes it very hard to believe either of your points about the Byrds being the single greatest American band (though, in agreement about VU, Muscle Shoals, and Family Stone being the great American bands of the era): even if you don't like style of the Doors, for example, the aesthetic they crafted was more natural, versatile, and visceral than the Byrds, which is why they survived the mid 60s and the Byrds did not.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts